Yesterday, the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee decided to throw out all the rules and give Obama votes he never received and delegates he never earned. In short, the DNC made the Supreme Court look like chumps in the disenfranchisement game.
This really should not come as any surprise. Obama’s whole intent of taking his name off the ballot was to disenfranchise the voters of Michigan. In Obama’s style of Chicago politics he would rather disenfranchise 600,000 voters that give Hillary a win in Michigan. None of this should come too much of a surprise. In order to win his Illinois state senate seat he abused ballot access laws by knocking all of his opponents off the ballot. If that is not voter disenfranchisement I don’t know what is. This past primary season the Obama machine denied voters all across Illinois the right to vote. When voters asked for a Green Party ballot the Obama machine, hid the ballots, threw them away, said they had run out, and denied there were such ballots.
Yesterday, the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee decided to give the voters of Michigan and Florida half a vote. This is far less than full voting rights and even less than the 3/5 th of a vote we look back at with historical shame. In Obama like fashion he sees this as a gift, or a concession as his campaign referred to it. Not only does Obama disenfranchise voters, he demands they be grateful for it.
At least with Florida you can argue there is some proportional relationship between votes and delegates. True, it is not equitable, but neither has been the delegate process as a whole. Hillary, for example, has had to get over 1000 more votes per delegate than Obama.
Michigan was another matter entirely. In seating Michigan at half strength they violated the DNC Charter, one person, one vote, and stole votes from one candidate to give to another. The DNC Charter is rather specific on the principle of fair reflection. The allotment of delegates should fairly reflect the will of the people. Giving Obama votes he never won and delegates he never earned is a direct violation of fair reflection.
Even Hillary was willing to compromise on this point with giving Obama the delegates from uncommitted. This of course was not good enough for the Obama machine, they not only wanted the uncommitted votes they never earned, but also the delegates that Hillary won. In short, they stole votes from the primary election that voters in their sacred trust gave to Hillary Clinton, and in all their wisdom granted them to The One.
What was this wisdom that they used. If you asked Donna Brazile, we should give as much or more weight to those who didn’t vote than those who did. So, using the Donna method, before we certify an election we ought to entertain the wishes of those who did not vote. Another aspect of this DNC wisdom was exit polling. Now, it is not enough that so many people voted for x, and so many for y, but we need a committee of 30 in all their wisdom interpreting what we really meant using the most recent polling software. Lastly, in all their wisdom they decided that the 30,000 write ins that could not be opened should be given to Obama.
Please explain to me by any stretch of the imagination, how this is democratic. It isn’t, which is why henceforth, these enemies of democracy, should be referred to as Obamacrats. It looks like the Obamacrats are going to get their wish of a full fight in the credentials committee at the Democratic Convention. Who knows, maybe that will get me to watch the Obamacratic Convention.